I have not done too much with SQL Server Failover Clustering except in test mode with Virtual Server and VMWare. This session was packed with experienced professionals who had seen it all.

Among the issues for SQL Server is the need to use shared storage for Always On Failover Cluster Instances. This is a problem for two reasons.

This seems like more of a server room question than one for the MS forum, but if I'm wrong let me know and I'll ask for a lock/move.In any event:I'm trying to lab up SQL Server 2008 in a 2-node ...

We expect that to be slower than the baseline, but by how much? <BR><BR>From a SQL architecture perspective, how would this differ than using a linked server? ••• Quote Report ...

Here you should enter the server, IP address, and volume associated with the secondary SQL Server node in your cluster. This will be the target to which DataKeeper replicates all the data from the ...