A federal appeals panel argued with lawyers over the still-unresolved election for a North Carolina Supreme Court seat.
On January 21, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson ...
The Supreme Court justices listened to oral arguments for more than an hour and are expected to issue a ruling quickly.
We will get a fair decision that provides helpful guidance and a path forward that allows states to protect children while honoring the First Amendment.
A partisan standoff in the Minnesota House of Representatives is now in the hands of the Minnesota Supreme Court. Justices on ...
The New Republic on MSN1dOpinion
Oklahoma Brings a Religious Freedom Tussle to the Supreme Court’s DoorPart church-versus-state conflict, part jurisdictional turf war, this Sooner State charter school fracas is one of the ...
A federal appeals panel has heard arguments involving a still-unresolved November election for a North Carolina Supreme Court ...
Entrance to the Minnesota Supreme Court chamber seen on Jan. 23 ... spent the majority of his 25 minutes during Thursday’s oral arguments telling the justices — minus associate Justice Karl Procaccini ...
The Nevada Supreme Court ruled on Monday that an Uber-funded ballot initiative designed to cap contingency fees in all civil ...
President Trump’s Justice Department on Friday asked the Supreme Court ... has been scheduled for oral arguments, but they were teed up to be heard during the court’s March or April sessions ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback