1. Manual testing is cheaper than automation testing for small projects. Smaller undertakings don’t have heaps of functionalities, and the volume regression is usually low.

Automated testing is an integral part of the continuous delivery pipeline. Despite its benefits, in reality most organizations still use outdated manual testing processes. In one survey by XBOsoft ...

The software testing landscape is undergoing a seismic shift. For years, continuous automation testing (CAT) platforms have been the gold standard for reducing manual testing and ensuring ...

Adopting codeless automation can bridge the gap between engineering and non-engineering teams, allowing more stakeholders to be involved in the testing process. “Quality is everyone’s ...

The suite’s production-grade, low-code automation and artificial intelligence tools aim to automate testing for enterprises, while still allowing companies to manage testing in their own way.

Applitools has released its report analyzing the trends of UI/UX testing automation, the 2022 State of UI/UX Testing Report.

DevOps and true “shift left” testing environments demand structure and flexibility throughout operations that can only be achieved through standardization and automation. Elevating testing ...

Is Manual or Automated Operation More Appropriate for Concrete Testing? Manually operated systems are frequently enough for concrete testing applications. Nevertheless, particular test standards which ...

For nearly 150 years, construction materials testing has been a manual effort. Whether in an engineering lab, a commercial lab, at cement/ready-mix manufacturers’ sites or in the field ...